# Explore Science

> An AI co-scientist for working researchers. Explore Science reviews manuscripts, chats about a paper it has actually read, searches the literature, and checks novelty, all from the same engine the lab uses to publish its own autonomous research.

Explore Science is an AI science laboratory. Every output, the manuscript review, Rosa the co-scientist chat, the novelty and integrity checks, runs on one engine that mixes multiple frontier models with an in-house science stack. A review can take up to two hours because rigour takes time; every paper receives a transparent 0-100 score that combines review quality with the field-specific evidential weight of the study design, with the full methodology and per-field evidence hierarchies published at https://explorescience.ai/scoring.

## Core pages

- [Explore Science](https://explorescience.ai): What the platform is and who it is for: an AI co-scientist for working researchers.
- [How it works](https://explorescience.ai/how-it-works): The autonomous review pipeline, built on a mixture of models and an in-house science stack.
- [How a paper is scored](https://explorescience.ai/scoring): The 0-100 scoring methodology in full: review quality combined with the evidential weight of the study design.
- [Features](https://explorescience.ai/features): Everything the platform does: manuscript review, Rosa the co-scientist chat, projects, the Calibre score, editorial review, novelty check, and teams.
- [Rosa, the co-scientist chat](https://explorescience.ai/chat): Rosa reads your manuscript, verifies its references, and answers from real evidence.
- [Grant review](https://explorescience.ai/grants): A pre-submission read of a grant proposal against the panel rubric. Currently pre-launch.
- [Research](https://explorescience.ai/research): Research from the lab that builds and publishes its own autonomous science.
- [Pricing](https://explorescience.ai/pricing): Free, Researcher, Researcher Pro, and Institution plans. The same engine on every tier; only the volume changes.
- [FAQ](https://explorescience.ai/faq): Questions scientists ask: model mixture, training, peer-review comparison, field coverage, and institutional policy.

## Blog

- [Welcome to the new home of Paper-Wizard: Explore Science](https://explorescience.ai/blog/paper-wizard-is-now-explore-science): Paper-Wizard has grown into something larger. Here is what that means:
- [How to do a good peer review?](https://explorescience.ai/blog/how-to-do-peer-review): Learn how to do a constructive, well-structured and useful peer review.
- [How pre-registrations, registered reports and well written research proposals improve your research](https://explorescience.ai/blog/pre-registration-research-planning): Learn how pre-registration and registered reports can improve your research quality and help combat questionable research practices.
- [Embodied AI Scientists: Running Experiments in the Physical World](https://explorescience.ai/blog/embodied-ai-scientist): What happens when AI steps out of the purely computational realm and begins interacting with the physical world? A milestone: the first AI system to autonomously conduct end-to-end scientific research with human participants.

## Research

Papers written end-to-end by the autonomous system, published under the lab's own DOIs.

- [Rigorous model comparison reveals linear speed-reasoning coupling](https://explorescience.ai/research/rigorous-model-comparison-reveals-linear-coupling): Autonomously generated by Explore Science.
- [Battery diversity is associated with simple structures in neuropsychological assessment](https://explorescience.ai/research/battery-diversity-simple-structures-neuropsychological): Autonomously generated by Explore Science, DOI 10.63708/exsci.6.
- [Trail Making complexity negatively associates with reasoning beyond processing speed](https://explorescience.ai/research/trail-making-complexity-negatively-associates-reasoning): Autonomously generated by Explore Science, DOI 10.63708/exsci.5.
- [Visual memory precision shows negligible spatial task links](https://explorescience.ai/research/visual-memory-precision-spatial-task-links): Autonomously generated by Explore Science.
- [Independence of visual working memory precision and mental rotation performance: theoretical and methodological implications](https://explorescience.ai/research/independence-visual-working-memory-mental-rotation): Autonomously generated by Explore Science.
- [Imagery vividness fails to predict serial dependence in visual working memory and mental rotation](https://explorescience.ai/research/imagery-vividness-serial-dependence-visual-working-memory): Autonomously generated by Explore Science.
- [Strategic visual memory allocation during complex mental rotation: Evidence for adaptive cognitive resources](https://explorescience.ai/research/strategic-visual-memory-allocation): Autonomously generated by Explore Science.

## Optional

- [Trust](https://explorescience.ai/trust): Security and compliance posture.
- [Data handling](https://explorescience.ai/data-handling): How manuscripts and research data are stored and used.
- [Privacy policy](https://explorescience.ai/privacy): How personal data is handled.
- [Terms](https://explorescience.ai/terms): Terms of service.