Skip to content

Chat with a scientist who has read every word.

Her name is Rosa. Not a chatbot guessing from a title, but a senior reviewer with your manuscript, your review, and your references open, pulling real evidence before she answers.

no card required

Evidence on demand

Ask a question. It goes and looks.

Behind a single reply it reads, quotes, and cross-checks several times before it answers. You see every step.

Watching it work

Check reference 12 and the figure in §4.
Reading manuscript

Reads your manuscript

It works from your full manuscript and the entire review, quoting the exact passage behind any finding, down to the section.

Verifies your references

Checks citations against the literature and flags anything retracted or unfindable.

Reads your materials

Datasets, notes, prior drafts: attach them and it answers from your own sources.

Situates your work

It weighs your claims against the published literature, flagging what is already established and where the contribution is genuinely new.

Bring your own sources

It works from the materials you attach.

Drop in your data, your pre-registration, prior drafts, links, and notes. Rosa reads them and answers from what they actually say, pointing straight back to the file.

Project materials · 5 attached+ Add
  • CSVpilot_data_n62.csvDataset · 2.4 MBReading
  • PDFpreregistration_v3.pdfProtocol · 312 KB
  • DOCXreviewer_response_draft.docxDraft · 88 KB
  • LINKOSF projectosf.io/xk9qd
  • NOTEReviewer 2 wants effect sizes for every contrastadded 3d ago
Read as data, never as instructions
Start to finish

A partner before, during, and after the review.

Rosa shifts with your project. She knows whether you are still shaping an idea or staring down a finished review.

  1. Before

    A thinking partner

    Scope a question, pressure-test a design, and check an idea is novel, before you write a single word.

    “Is this question worth chasing?”

  2. During

    Honest while it reviews

    Talk through methods and framing while the review runs. It is candid about what it cannot see yet.

    “Sanity-check my analysis plan.”

  3. After

    The full consultant

    Every finding, every reference, every figure, all in one conversation, ready to act on.

    “Walk me through the major issues.”

Try it yourself

Ask it something.

These replies are scripted, but everything in them is live. Click a finding, a citation, a figure. Then point it at your own paper.

Rosa
reading · Neural correlates of recall.pdf
Ask me anything about this paper. Pick a question to see how I answer.
Point it at my paper

free to start · no card required

Earned, not claimed

Principled where it counts. Personal only where it helps.

A consultant you can trust knows when to hold the line. It refuses to bend on the things that matter, and adapts to you only where that genuinely helps.

It tells you the inconvenient parts

It states what is wrong plainly, including the parts you would rather not hear. A reviewer worth having does not flatter.

Grounded in the evidence

Analysis built on real results, citations checked against real sources, claims backed by work it has actually done.

No vanity number

It never leads with a score. The conversation is about what to fix, not a figure to frame.

Calibrated to you

It matches your field and career stage in how it explains, never in what it concludes, and you can switch even that off.

Start the conversation

Rosa is waiting on your paper.

Make an account, upload a draft, and start asking. The first project is free, and the conversation is open from the moment you arrive.

Rosa, the AI co-scientist chat · Explore Science