Every surface
on the platform.
A suite of tools for every part of your scientific workflow, built on our autonomous-research stack. Read how it works →
Manuscript review.
Hours of in-depth analysis on your paper: benchmarked with details of both issues and merits, verified references, field-specific standards, and a Calibre score out of 100.
Upload a paper→Meet Rosa.
Ask Rosa anything. She's always up-to-date with your work, so discuss any point: clarify, object, learn. Always grounded in the literature.
Try the chat→Projects & iteration.
One workspace per paper. Address the feedback, watch your Calibre score climb. Every revision is a measurable step toward publication.
Start a project→Protocol review.
A check for planned research, prior to study execution: pre-registrations, proposals, protocols. Optimise your research while changes still cost nothing.
Review a protocol→Novelty check.
Assess whether your research contributes something new to the field. Weighs your claims, methods, aims, and findings against the literature.
Check novelty→Editorial review.
The paper through an editor's eyes: a tailored journal fit assessment of scope, novelty, and impact. Includes key metrics of communication and scientific rigour.
Review a paper→Originality & AI checks.
Match the manuscript against web and academic sources, flag AI-written passages, and screen every figure for synthetic or edited images: one scan, three lenses.
Run an integrity scan→References, verified.
Every bibliographic entry validated against its real source with inaccuracies and omissions flagged. Connect Zotero and import directly to your library.
Check your references→File storage.
Everything for a project in one place: uploads, reviews, data, code. Versioned and chat-readable, so Rosa can draw on any of it.
Opportunities for you.
Open funding calls and target journals matched to your field and work - with award sizes, deadlines, quartiles, and the reason each one fits.
See your matches→Teams & labs.
One review standard across every paper your group ships. Invite, share, collaborate..
Start a team→Collaborator profiles.
Every co-author on a project carries an enriched card: bibliometrics, research focus, and recent work, pulled from ORCID, OpenAlex, and Scholar.
Complete your profile→Amplify the work.
Turn your finished review into ready-to-post pieces: a thread, LinkedIn post, lay summary, significance statement, or press release. Drafted in your voice.
Amplify a paper→Beyond the review.
The editor.
In progressWrite inside the platform, not a separate tool. A full editor with real-time co-authoring, inline suggestions and LaTeX export.
Literature review.
In progressFrom a broad topic or a precise question: a scoping or systematic review that covers the literature in full, structured and referenced, in 6 to 12 hours.
The scorecard.
In progressAn assessment of published papers by quality, not citation count. See where papers stand.
The AI Scientist.
The end-to-end system: idea to manuscript. Yours to run in full or in part. The AI Scientist traverses the full arc of science in a single pipeline - novelty, design, analysis, figures, drafting - but you decide where to jump in and where to stop. Given a hypothesis, it designs a rigorous method. Given data, it executes a reproducible analysis pipeline. Every standalone capability leads here.