Tools for each part of your scientific workflow.
Built on the autonomous-research stack that publishes our own papers.
Most researchers start here
Manuscript review.
Hours of in-depth analysis on your paper: verified references, your field's standards, and a Calibre score from 0 to 100.
Everything your paper needs,
in one workspace.
More tools, next to the review. Each opens in the same project.
Meet Rosa.
Ask Rosa anything. She always has your work in view. Discuss each point: clarify, object, learn. Always grounded in the literature.
Try the chat
Projects & iteration.
One workspace for each paper. Address the issues, and your Calibre score climbs.
Start a project
Protocol review.
A check for research before the study starts: pre-registrations, proposals, protocols. Improve the design while changes cost nothing.
Review a protocol
Novelty check.
Assess if your research contributes something new to the field. Weighs your claims, methods, aims, and findings against the literature.
Check novelty
Editorial review.
The paper through an editor's eyes: a tailored journal fit assessment with key metrics of communication and rigour.
Review a paper
Six integrity checks.
One scan reports text similarity, AI-written text, AI-generated figures, retracted citations, tortured phrases (a paper-mill signal), and the declarations a journal checks at desk screening.
Start an integrity scan
Verified references.
Each bibliographic entry validated against its real source, inaccuracies and omissions flagged. Connect Zotero and import directly to your library.
Check your references
File storage.
Everything for a project in one place: manuscript, supplementary materials, reviews, data, code. Rosa can use all of it in your discussion.
Opportunities for you.
Open funding calls and target journals, matched to your field and work.
See your matches
Teams & labs.
Invite your collaborators to comment on the review, discuss it, and decide together how to address the issues.
Start a team
Collaborator profiles.
Each co-author's profile, built from their ORCID, OpenAlex, and Scholar records.
Complete your profile
Amplify the work.
Turn your completed review into pieces you can post: a thread, LinkedIn post, lay summary, significance statement, or press release.
Amplify a paperRoadmap
What we are building next.
Three tools in progress. Each one points at the same end: the full autonomous pipeline, in your hands.
In progress
Text editor.
Write in the platform, not a separate tool. A full editor with real-time co-authoring, inline suggestions, and LaTeX export.
In progress
Literature review.
From a broad topic or a precise question: a scoping or systematic review that covers the literature in full, structured and referenced, in 6 to 12 hours.
In progress
The scorecard.
An assessment of published papers by quality, not citation count. See where papers stand.
The AI Scientist.
- Given a hypothesis
- Given data
- Given a question
Assess and generate novel research questions.
Learn how the engine thinks.
No card required